Contact

Reaching the editorial team at Astrological Authority is straightforward — whether the question is about a specific article, a correction to a planetary glyph description, or a request to see a topic like Chiron in astrology covered in greater depth. This page explains the available contact channels, the geographic scope of the resource, and what to include in a message to get the fastest, most useful response.

Additional contact options

The primary channel is the contact form on this page, but it is not the only one. Depending on the nature of the inquiry, one route tends to work better than another:

• Editorial corrections — factual errors, broken internal links, or outdated source citations are best submitted through the contact form with the page URL included in the message body.
• Topic requests — suggestions for new reference pages, such as a deeper look at electional astrology or an expansion of the astrological certifications and organizations reference, can be sent through the same form with "Topic Request" noted in the subject line.
• Press or research inquiries — journalists, students, and researchers looking to reference this site's content or request background on astrological methodology should use the contact form and note their affiliation and deadline. Turnaround for these requests is typically within 3 business days.
• Accessibility issues — if any page on this site is not rendering correctly with assistive technology, that is treated as a high-priority report and will be addressed ahead of standard editorial requests.

The site does not maintain public social media accounts linked to this editorial team. Messages sent to third-party platforms cannot be guaranteed to reach the right desk.

How to reach this office

The contact form on this page routes directly to the editorial desk. There is no phone line — astrology is a written tradition going back at least 2,500 years, and it turns out that also describes the preferred medium for correspondence here.

Messages are reviewed Monday through Friday. Volume varies by season; inquiries submitted around major astrological events — eclipse seasons, Saturn return discussions following major cultural moments, Mercury retrograde periods — tend to arrive in clusters, so response times during those windows may extend to 5 business days rather than the standard 2 to 3.

For time-sensitive editorial corrections where accuracy is at stake, flagging the message as "Correction — Urgent" in the subject line moves it to the front of the review queue.

Service area covered

Astrological Authority is a nationally scoped reference resource serving readers across the United States. The site is written in English and calibrated to a US-based audience in terms of cultural context, though the astrological content itself — birth chart interpretation, transit analysis, synastry frameworks — is not geographically bounded. A Saturn return operates the same way in Phoenix as it does in Portland.

Readers from outside the United States are welcome to use this resource and submit inquiries. Response capacity is the same regardless of origin location. The site does not localize content by region — there is no separate version for the East Coast versus the Pacific time zone, for instance — but time zone considerations do come up naturally in articles covering solar return charts and lunar return charts, where the location of residence at the time of the return matters astronomically.

The scope comparison worth naming explicitly: this is a reference site, not a consultation service. It covers the mechanics, history, and interpretive frameworks of astrology as a discipline — closer in function to a reference library than a practitioner's office. For readers looking for personalized readings, what to expect from a reading and how to choose an astrologer are the relevant starting points.

What to include in your message

A well-constructed message gets a faster, more useful response. The difference between a message that resolves in one exchange and one that takes four back-and-forths usually comes down to 3 specific pieces of information:

1. The specific page or topic — paste the URL or name the article. "The page about rising signs" is less actionable than linking directly to Rising Sign Explained.
2. The nature of the inquiry — correction, topic request, research question, accessibility report, or press inquiry. These route to different reviewers, and labeling helps.
3. Supporting detail — for corrections, quote the specific sentence that appears to be in error and, if possible, cite the source that contradicts it. For topic requests, a sentence or two on why the gap matters is more persuasive than a bare title. For research inquiries, a word about the project's scope and the requester's institutional affiliation (if any) helps calibrate the depth of the response.

Messages that arrive without any of these elements are not ignored, but they do take longer to resolve — simply because the first reply will be a request for the missing information. Treating the message like a well-structured question rather than a text message tends to produce the best outcome.

One thing that does not belong in the message: personal birth data submitted speculatively, on the chance that the editorial team will interpret it. That is not a service offered here. For orientation on how birth charts work before consulting a practitioner, Natal Chart Basics covers the foundational mechanics in practical terms.